🔗 Share this article

A digital rights group has claimed to have scraped a vast number of tracks from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to publish them online.

Potential Boost for AI Development

Observers noted the apparent leak could aid AI companies looking for data to train their technology.

An entity called Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million rows of associated data such as artist and album names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million tracks, stated that the leak did not represent its entire catalog.

“We have identified and deactivated the malicious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” stated a Spotify representative.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorized access identified a external actor scraped public metadata and employed questionable tactics to circumvent DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Declared Mission and Worries

The streaming service does not believe the music taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They asserted the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of sharing large data files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “preserving humanity’s information and heritage”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ rights, remarked the breached music would likely be utilized for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on illegally sourced material is sadly common in the AI industry, so this stolen music is highly likely to end up instructing AI models,” he stated.

The Anna’s Archive site alludes to a large online archive, a huge online archive of copyrighted books that has reportedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to train its AI models.

The co-founder of an AI startup wrote on the professional network that individuals of the public could in principle “build their own personal free equivalent of the service”. The executive added it could also allow tech companies to “educate models on modern music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a key issue between creatives, writers and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

Across Britain, creative professionals have protested against a government suggestion to allow AI companies utilize protected work without permission unless the rights holder signals. Virtually every participant to a government consultation on the idea has supported artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for technology, research and technology informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The government has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.