🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are observing intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of nations are moving toward similar bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our children's innocence". Legislation may be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "one of the options in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has urged lawmakers to enact a bill raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged families to prevent their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a advisory statement supporting a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a solid first step," commented the European lawmaker behind the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Earlier, support grew behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the administration pledged to investigate the issue.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a teenager who died after encountering harmful social media material suggests that a simple age ban might not protect children and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to create tools that are secure and age appropriate for children," said a prominent peer.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, action is primarily unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a bill barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further use requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills demanding adult authorization for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from various figures to follow this path, a federal ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, further states are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, international bodies adopt a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "might backfire". The body notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

Even as this worldwide discussion unfolds, the policies of this nation and others show that policymakers around the world are no longer willing to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.